The court has allowed plaintiff's First Amendment claim against School District decisionmakers based on this to go forward.
Some excerpts from today's long decision by Judge Eric Melgren (D. Kan.) in Schmidt v. Huff:
On February 3, 2025, Plaintiff visited the high school in the evening to prepare snack bags for the next day [in her capacity as volunteer for her son's wrestling team].... After she finished, Plaintiff went upstairs to the second floor and found the room number associated with a promotional poster for the Gay Straight Alliance Club. The classroom's lights were already on, and the door was open. Plaintiff took pictures of the classroom door, posters displayed on the classroom walls, and books stacked on the classroom bookshelves. The classroom door had multiple posters and stickers on it, including the teacher's last name.
"Libs of TikTok" is a popular social media account known for posting photos and videos of individuals or organizations that often express progressive or liberal views, especially those surrounding topics like LGBTQ+ rights, education, and identity. The account typically collects its content by browsing public posts on social media and reposting them, or by directly posting submissions from followers who send in content they believe aligns with the account's focus. Although named Libs of TikTok on all platforms, the account is active on multiple social media networks, including Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, and TikTok.
Plaintiff sent the Libs of TikTok X account the pictures she took at the school. Plaintiff had no control over whether Libs of TikTok saw her photos, decided to post them, picked which ones to post, or would notify her when it did post her photos. On February 7, 2025, at 10:26 a.m., Libs of TikTok posted the photo of the classroom door that Plaintiff had submitted. The post's caption read, "School in Gardner, Kansas (@GEHSBlazers) Strip them of their funding immediately." ...
That same afternoon, ... Superintendent Huff confronted Plaintiff about taking pictures and sending them to Libs of TikTok. Defendant Huff told Plaintiff that her actions disrupted the school day because the teacher whose name was posted on the classroom door was so distraught by the online comments that she asked to leave for the rest of the school day.
On February 11, 2025, Defendant Huff emailed Plaintiff a letter on official District letterhead (the "Letter"). The Letter stated the following: